Automatic Activity Planning?

Started by Christoph Voelker, May 11, 2019, 03:40:49 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Liviu Lalescu

If the speed of generation is maybe too low with the constraints activities occupy min, I thought of a possible improvement if the selected slots are only of a FET day (so, a vertical column). It is not trivial, but it might improve things. The time for these constraints will be directly proportional to the number of columns (88) instead of with the number of active activities (~340). If you will have more activities, it might be a good idea.

Let me know if you need this.

Liviu Lalescu

Quote from: Liviu Lalescu on June 10, 2019, 08:54:20 PM
If the speed of generation is maybe too low with the constraints activities occupy min, I thought of a possible improvement if the selected slots are only of a FET day (so, a vertical column). It is not trivial, but it might improve things. The time for these constraints will be directly proportional to the number of columns (88) instead of with the number of active activities (~340). If you will have more activities, it might be a good idea.

Let me know if you need this.

Hmm, no, I think it won't work :(   Anyway, the speed is acceptable for now.

bachiri401

I still do no not understand in the two custom versions fet aat and get aap what must users isert as data
in the other customs (we insert the school/days/hours of the day/teachers/students/subjects/ activities with teachers and students then constraints and we generate the timetable) the timetable is the end product,
But in these two versions our end product is normally ( specify the teachers to teach which groups)
please can you send us any explanation

Liviu Lalescu

Please read the readme.txt and in the examples you have some examples.