Dear Sir:
Is it a bug when I use the function "A set of subactivities has a set of preferred time slots"?
There are two *.fet attached.
OK.fet has a Activity_Group_Id 1 and it's activity Id 1,2,3,4,5.
Not_OK.fet's Activity_Group_Id 1 and it's activity Id 11,12,13,14,15.
The only difference between two files is the activity Id.
Looking forward to your reply.
You modified the fet file yourself, didn't you?
If FET produced the file itself: please tell us how you done it. i can't reproduce the bug.
I guess you modified it yourself and you forgot to modify the <Activity_Group_Id>. It still refer to id 1, but there is no id 1 on that file. So that is a bug of course.
If you group activities, then the ids should be ordered and they should be also consecutive.
So 4, 5, 6 is fine.
But 5, 4, 6 is bad, since it is not ordered.
Also 4, 5, 7 is bad, since it is not consecutive.
The group id should be the lowest value.
If the group contains only a single activity, then the group id should be 0 instead of the itself.
Yes, I did modified FET files.
And thank you so much for introducing to me the relations between group Activities and Activity_Group_Id!