Main Menu
Menu

Show posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Show posts Menu

Messages - brunover

#1
I'm testing 1+1+1 (min days...=0%) with 2 consecutive activities constraints (99%). It seems to be an acceptable compromise.
Regards.
#2
Perfect!
Thank you
#3
But so, it seems impossible to split in 1+1+1 as a second chance, if not succeed in doing 2+1
Yours truly
#4
NEED: split an activity in a week by the follow possible modes
2 + 1 (preferred)
1 + 2 (also good)
1 + 1 + 1 (only if FET is not able to place in previus mode)
I tried it by setting:
split into....activies per week = 3
duration = 1+1+1
the minimum required distance in days ... = 1
percentage = 0%
force consecutive ... = checked,
but FET tries to place in 1+1+1 mode before of 2+1
Thanks
#5
I have tried the trick, which allows an exact control of constraint in easy way and  allows to use the latest version of FET always
Thanks
#6
Yes, it works well. Thank you.
Hope get this constraint to official FET
#7
By law a teacher in Italy must work not less of 5 days a week
#8
Report a Bug / Activity set of preferred time slots
October 05, 2008, 11:02:13 PM
This setting has no effect