Hello,
Activity preferred times adds X (not available) with any weight. The largest value for each slot wins. So, you will come out with: 99% denied in all slots without Mon aft, Tue mor, and Wed; 95% denied on Wed, and 90% denied on Mon aft. Yes, it is a good strategy.
Maybe another method, please think and try a bit: activities occupy min time slots from selection, for all activities of that teacher. Unfortunately, only 100% allowed, but it instructs FET which slots should be occupied with activities of this teacher.
Or maybe combine the above approaches.
I tend to prefer only 100% constraints, because those 99%, 95%, and 90% must be broken to produce a timetable, and might waste time. My only "allowed" <100% is for min days. I admit I don't like especially preferred times with <100%.
Activity preferred times adds X (not available) with any weight. The largest value for each slot wins. So, you will come out with: 99% denied in all slots without Mon aft, Tue mor, and Wed; 95% denied on Wed, and 90% denied on Mon aft. Yes, it is a good strategy.
Maybe another method, please think and try a bit: activities occupy min time slots from selection, for all activities of that teacher. Unfortunately, only 100% allowed, but it instructs FET which slots should be occupied with activities of this teacher.
Or maybe combine the above approaches.
I tend to prefer only 100% constraints, because those 99%, 95%, and 90% must be broken to produce a timetable, and might waste time. My only "allowed" <100% is for min days. I admit I don't like especially preferred times with <100%.
