Messages

Hi guys!

Is there a possibility to add an option to show long names of hours in timetables views?
(I know it's possible to switch long names and names in my case, but then I can't to get them to be unique.)

Thanks in advance!

Give me a day or two to get full xml.

I just done a quick view.
Most parts are pretty strait forward.
I think I can write a converter, but I am not sure how fast I am. I am very busy next week and I have some other TODOs on my list first. So it might take a few weeks.

I am not sure about line 211 and similar. There is for example "1. Grupa". hmm... Is that "1. Grupa" more like a FET subgroup? I don't think so, since there is also something like "divisiontag="1"". So I guess it is more like a FET division.
I can see similar names and divisions in other years. I guess they are separated per year, don't they? Or are they over all students of the whole school? (I don't think so, since in that case there are much too less groups for so many students.)

I will write you an email tomorrow morning.

There is no rush!

There is set of subjects that are not obligatory but students choose those if they want. In every class there are students who choose such subjects and students who don't. 1. Grupa is just a mark for group of students within a class (group) who choose some of non obligatory subjects. In the terms of FET it would be a tag.

Attribute "divisiontag" is basically a tag in fet, and the value 1 or 2 means there is kind of tags (class is divided into 2 groups by non obligatory subjects, and into two groups by gender - Djevjočice and Dječaci). In my opinion those "gender" tags are set by default but optional to use. Attribute "entireclass = "1/0"" means if group contains all the students of the class or not. And yes, students are divided into years and then separated into classes. Divisions are separated per year.  I hope you get the picture.

Yes. xml is a text file. Let me have a look at it. But you are aware that TiTiTo is closed source only, don't you?

Yes, and I'm thinking about buying it anyway. At the moment I'm still trying to figure out all the possibilities it offers. Can you please send me a private message about the price, conditions and other info? Give me a day or 2 to get full xml database. A the moment all I have is a part of it, but I'm not sure if it contains all of nodes and relevant data.

Since I already have converters in TiTiTo, I might also add one for aSc.
Sadly with the aSc Demo version I is impossible to export and save files and there is also no description of the file format. So I can do it only if you help me.

I fear it will be nearly impossible, if aSc can only export a binary file format.
But if there are text export file formats, then you could sent me same sample files.
Start with a basic easy sample file and give my more difficult ones later.
I will have a look and might code it.

Hi Volker!

I have got this year a duty of remaking schedule that is already made (in asc of course) which I don't want to use (hard core linux user philosophy ). Yes, they make binary *.roz file, but their schedule can be exported as xml. Would that help?

Thanks in advance!

Hello, cracker_vic,

No, surely not an inappropriate question! We welcome any ideas, even if they refer to competition.

First of all, my question is, do you consider aSc Timetables made a better computation of the schedule than FET and you want to import it (the timetable) just to display it (the timetable) in FET or TiTiTo?

Then, I know that aSc Timetables implemented a long time ago a FET import, but it worked bad when I tried it. Unfortunately, the notions in different timetabling software are very different and it is difficult to convert automatically.

Then, I think aSc Timetables has a proprietary format. I am not sure, maybe they have XML export, but it might be only enabled if you buy it.

Then, a big problem with FET is the lack of financial support.

It is Volker's board, about TiTiTo, so I hope he will answer, maybe better than me.

Hi Liviu!

No, I don't think asc is any better then fet. In contrary, I think that fet uses better algorithm. Since I'm a linux user for a long time I can't even run it except maybe in virtualbox or wine what I don't like at all.

Hi guys!

First of all, I'm not sure if this is an appropriate question, but is there any way to import asc schedule and convert it into fet?

Thanks in advance!

I'm on cinnamon desktop, so still x11, and yes i have complete qt6 installed.

Arch is bleeding edge distro. I doubt there is newer os...

I run it from terminal (first made it executable). The other version works. Is that appimage installer or just executable? Because I don't see app in app menu...

Here is log from terminal:

src/gbm_drv_common.c:131: GBM-DRV error (get_bytes_per_component): Unknown or not supported format: 808530000

src/gbm_drv_common.c:131: GBM-DRV error (get_bytes_per_component): Unknown or not supported format: 808530000

src/gbm_drv_common.c:131: GBM-DRV error (get_bytes_per_component): Unknown or not supported format: 808530000

src/gbm_drv_common.c:131: GBM-DRV error (get_bytes_per_component): Unknown or not supported format: 808530000

src/gbm_drv_common.c:131: GBM-DRV error (get_bytes_per_component): Unknown or not supported format: 808530000

src/gbm_drv_common.c:131: GBM-DRV error (get_bytes_per_component): Unknown or not supported format: 808530000

src/gbm_drv_common.c:131: GBM-DRV error (get_bytes_per_component): Unknown or not supported format: 808530000

src/gbm_drv_common.c:131: GBM-DRV error (get_bytes_per_component): Unknown or not supported format: 808530000

src/gbm_drv_common.c:131: GBM-DRV error (get_bytes_per_component): Unknown or not supported format: 808530000

src/gbm_drv_common.c:131: GBM-DRV error (get_bytes_per_component): Unknown or not supported format: 808530000

15

I tried to install linux version (AppImage) with no luck. I'm using arch distro. Any clue?

Thank you very much for a reply. I've done this already in html by customizing css. I didn't know about qt rendering engine limitations. Thanks anyway!

Hi guys!

First of all thanks for the great software. I love it.

I don't think it's really a bug but it would be really nice if tables in print (preview) dialog could be all the same width.


Best regards!