min activities in a building

[Liviu Lalescu]

Received! 

[Benahmed Abdelkrim]

Please check 

[Liviu Lalescu]

I sent that file back to you, so you can update the field you suggested changed. I am now waiting for your update file.

[Benahmed Abdelkrim]

hmm ... I just had an idea; what about the other variants: MHPD, MHPW, and MSPD? Can they still be used in room comments in the official FET?

[Liviu Lalescu]

Hmm... sorry, even if we created nice constraints, not comments, I am not sure we can implement them perfectly in the generation.

[Benahmed Abdelkrim]

In my opinion, it's not necessary to integrate them into the official FET.

[Liviu Lalescu]

Great then, but we really cannot add these 3 constraints not even in the comments.

[Benahmed Abdelkrim]

At the beginning of NSRT they may have been useful, but now with the new approach and constraints they have become useless even in the comments.

[Liviu Lalescu]

Oh, really great! 

We found a typo in the strings, I just sent you a new email. I apologize!

[Benahmed Abdelkrim]

By the way, I think the nsrt version can be left on the custom versions page for those who want to use these variables, But unfortunately, it will no longer be supported after this integration into the official FET.

[Benahmed Abdelkrim]

The attached file below shows a specific case of exams that requires 3 teachers per building(real room).
@Liviu Lalescu: I recommend adding this example to the FET examples directory.

[Liviu Lalescu]

I added the example.

I had in mind to remove the NSRT, but, if you want, we can leave it.

[Benahmed Abdelkrim]

Thank you! 

[Liviu Lalescu]

Benahmed, I have an idea to allow durations greater than one. Should we try?

[Benahmed Abdelkrim]

Benahmed, I have an idea to allow durations greater than one. Should we try?

Oh!... Yes, it will be a nice addition! But only If it does not lead to instability errors.