Main Menu

FET can do this?

Started by spoontex, August 01, 2022, 09:34:21 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

spoontex

Hi,

I'm a music teacher, who gives individual lessons. Can FET generate a schedule according to the student's availability?

For example:

I have 4 days a week of work, from 3.15 to 7:45 PM. The duration of each class is 45 minutes.

I have 20 students and I know the availability of each student. Can it be entered in FET and that it generates the schedule in relation to my work availability?

Thanks.

fourat

Try the constraint a set of activity has a set of preferred starting time or the constraint a set of activity has a set of preferrd time slots

Liviu Lalescu

#2
Hello,

This is very easy for FET: just add you as a teacher, a year, a group in this year, and students individually as subgroups in this group. Then use constraints students set not available times for each student, and add activities with you and a subgroup.

Add each FET hour = real 45 minutes.

spoontex

Quote from: Liviu Lalescu on August 01, 2022, 10:14:19 AMHello,

This is very easy for FET: just add you as a teacher, a year, a group in this year, and students individually as subgroups in this group. Then use constraints students set not available times for each student, and add activities with you and a subgroup.

Add each FET hour = real 45 minutes.


Amazing!!

Buy how can I add FET hour??

Thanks.

spoontex

I made a video.

https://vimeo.com/735452103

can you tell me if i did it right?

Thanks!

Liviu Lalescu

Sorry, but I need to login to Vimeo and I would not like to do this now.

You can send me your video on my email listed here: https://lalescu.ro/liviu/fet/contacts.html

You enter FET > Data > Basic > Days and then Hours, enter the name of the start of the lesson.

You can also send me your .fet file by email.

spoontex


Liviu Lalescu

Sorry for replying so late. I did not receive the video. I will send you an email now to check.

Liviu Lalescu

Looks OK, but it is simpler than what you said in the previous posts here.